Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Streamflow regimes for CAMELS dataset


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 9.2 KB
Created: Jan 23, 2020 at 10:28 p.m.
Last updated: Apr 20, 2020 at 7:31 p.m. (Metadata update)
Published date: Apr 20, 2020 at 7:31 p.m.
DOI: 10.4211/hs.069f552f96ef4e638f4bec281c5016ad
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Published
Views: 2453
Downloads: 88
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

Streamflow regime classes identified for the 671 stations in the CAMELS dataset (United States) using functional data analysis: (1) intermittent regime, (2) strong winter regime, (3) weak winter regime, (4) melt regime, and (5) New Year's regime. The textfile contains a table with the USGS gauge ID of each catchment in the CAMELS dataset and their regime class (1-5). More information on the CAMELS dataset can be found in Newman et al. (2015) and Addor et al. (2017). A detailed description on how the regime classes were derived can be found in Brunner et al. (2020).

Addor, N., A. J. Newman, N. Mizukami, and M. P. Clark (2017), The CAMELS data set: Catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21(10), 5293–5313, doi:10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017.
Brunner, M. I., A. Newman, L. A. Melsen, and A. Wood (2020), Functional streamflow regime classes in the United States and their future changes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., under review.
Newman, A. J. et al. (2015), Development of a large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological data set for the contiguous USA: Data set characteristics and assessment of regional variability in hydrologic model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19(1), 209–223, doi:10.5194/hess-19-209-2015.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
North Latitude
49.7284°
East Longitude
-64.3297°
South Latitude
23.8913°
West Longitude
-126.0290°

Content

Related Resources

This resource is described by Brunner, M. I., A. Newman, L. A. Melsen, and A. Wood (2020), Future streamflow regime changes in the United States: assessment using functional classification, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., under review; https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2020-54/
The content of this resource is derived from Newman, A. J. et al. (2015), Development of a large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological data set for the contiguous USA: Data set characteristics and assessment of regional variability in hydrologic model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19(1), 209–223, doi:10.5194/hess-19-209-2015.
The content of this resource is derived from Addor, N., A. J. Newman, N. Mizukami, and M. P. Clark (2017), The CAMELS data set: Catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21(10), 5293–5313, doi:10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017.

How to Cite

Brunner, M. (2020). Streamflow regimes for CAMELS dataset, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.069f552f96ef4e638f4bec281c5016ad

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required