Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

MATERIALS AND METHODS USED FOR "Trends in Water Use, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emissions from Irrigation: Role of Shifting Technologies and Energy Source"


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 10.9 GB
Created: Oct 22, 2020 at 4:17 p.m.
Last updated: Nov 13, 2020 at 6:53 p.m. (Metadata update)
Published date: Nov 13, 2020 at 6:53 p.m.
DOI: 10.4211/hs.211ed5225921483388cc0ee023563a30
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Content types: Single File Content  Geographic Feature Content 
Sharing Status: Published
Views: 1423
Downloads: 326
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

These scripts show the detailed methods that were used for the data presented in McCarthy et al. (2020). The manuscript illustrates results and explains potential mechanisms fueling energy and emissions changes in the High Plains Aquifer portion of the HPA. This analysis looks at water use from 1994-2016, a time where Kansas saw a large shift in irrigation technologies from predominantly high pressure center pivots to lower pressure center pivot variants such as Low Energy Precision Application (LEPA). End result of the code is a series of comma separated .csv files containing the location, energy source, direct energy from pumping, energy footprint from pumping and greenhouse gas emissions of the Kansas portion of the HPA from 1994-2016. This dataset pulls from various sources, described in the readme.md file below. Mainly, data from Water Information Management & Analysis System (WIMAS) was processed and expanded to serve our energy calculation purposes. Main inputs from this dataset include well location, irrigation system type and water use. A series of irrigation scenarios were then conducted on the processed dataset to observe potential energy savings: Observed irrigation and energy source shift, static irrigation and observed energy source shift, static irrigation and energy sources, and observed irrigation and static energy source shift. A detailed analysis of these results can be found in the main manuscript.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
High Plains Aquifer portion of Kansas
North Latitude
40.0437°
East Longitude
-95.7012°
South Latitude
36.9667°
West Longitude
-102.0733°

Temporal

Start Date:
End Date:

Content

readme.md

MATERIALS AND METHODS USED FOR "Trends in Water Use, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emissions from Irrigation: Role of Shifting Technologies and Energy Source" A publication in Environmental Sceince and Technology

Authors: Benjamin McCarthy, Robert Anex, Yong Wang, Anthony D. Kendall, Annick Anctil, Erin M. K. Haacker, David W. Hyndman

In this repository () there are four main folders: 01_Input, 02_Analysis, 03_EnergySources, 04_Plotter, 05_Results. Here's what they do:

01_Input: This folder contains the first script that needs to be run. Here, the first run will process our initial WIMAS data (found in the Data folder, along with a series of other datasets mentioned below).

FPDIV_WIMAS_INPUT.py -This script is what gathers the initial data from the WIMAS database. It also extracts other values from other databases, such as:

  1. Hydraulic Conductivity (meters/day)

Cederstrand, Joel, and Mark Becker. Digital Map of Hydraulic Conductivity for High Plains Aquifer in Parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. 1998, doi:10.3133/ofr98548.Cederstrand, Joel, and Mark Becker. Digital Map of Hydraulic Conductivity for High Plains Aquifer in Parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. 1998, doi:10.3133/ofr98548.

  1. Specific Yield

    McGuire, V. L., et al. Specific Yield, High Plains Aquifer. 2012, http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20125177.

  2. Depth to water (meters)

Depth to water is estimated in the script using two different sources:

Water Levels were obtained from:

Haacker, Erin M. K., et al. Water Level Declines in the High Plains Aquifer: Predevelopment to Resource Senescence. Groundwater, vol. 54, no. 2, 2016, pp. 23142, doi:10.1111/gwat.12350.

CONUS DEM from:

*National Elevation Dataset - NAVD88 Meters - 1/3rd-Arc-Second (Approx. 10m). 2012, https://gisdata.nd.gov/Metadata/ISO/html/metadata_DEM_NED_10m.html#ID0EEBBGOA.

  1. Saturated Thickness (meters) Saturated thickness was obtained from:

Haacker, Erin M. K., et al. Water Level Declines in the High Plains Aquifer: Predevelopment to Resource Senescence. Groundwater, vol. 54, no. 2, 2016, pp. 23142, doi:10.1111/gwat.12350.

  1. High Plains Aquifer Boundary

    Qi, S. L. Digital Map of the Aquifer Boundary of the High Plains Aquifer in Parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 543. 2010, https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/543/.

  2. End product from this script is a pandas dataframe 'LiftDF' which is stored in a pandas hdfs: C:/WIMAS_Methods_Scripts/00_Data/Kansas_WIMAS.h5

02_Analysis: Here we have the scripts that do the analytical work. We have the two irrigation scenarios in this folder, along with th energy source scenarios.

FPDIV_WIMAS_ANALYSIS.py

  • This script gathers the 'LiftDF' stored data and calculates total lift energy using simple energy equation ENERGY = MASS * GRAVITY * WATER_LIFT
  • This energy result DOES NOT take into account pump efficiencies

  • In this script: Drawdown calculation, irrigation system pressurization, pump rate estimates.

    • End product from this script is a pandas dataframe 'LiftEnergyDF' which is stored in a pandas hdfs: S:\Users\mccar454\Project_Files\2017\WIMAS_CHP\Kansas_WIMAS.h5 -The other output is a shapefile stored in a gdb file name "Kansas_FPDIV.gdb" That will go into the Energy Sources work described below

FPDIV_WIMAS_ANALYSIS_NOLEPARUN.py

  • This is a similar script to the one above, but it assumes that no LEPA occured, and converts all center pivot technology to conventional center pivot.

GWCO2_Contribution_Analysis.py This script takes into account the CO2 released from directly depleting the aquifer.

Bicarbonate site data: Two versions were downloaded Site Data only Sample results (narrow) https://www.waterqualitydata.us/portal/#countrycode=US&statecode=US%3A20&sampleMedia=Water&characteristicName=Bicarbonate&providers=NWIS&providers=STORET&mimeType=csv

Saturated Thickness (meters) Saturated thickness was obtained from: *Haacker, Erin M. K., et al. Water Level Declines in the High Plains Aquifer: Predevelopment to Resource Senescence. Groundwater, vol. 54, no. 2, 2016, pp. 23142, doi:10.1111/gwat.12350.

Water Levels were obtained from: *Haacker, Erin M. K., et al. Water Level Declines in the High Plains Aquifer: Predevelopment to Resource Senescence. Groundwater, vol. 54, no. 2, 2016, pp. 23142, doi:10.1111/gwat.12350.

03_EnergySources: This section was created by Yong Wang (wangyong0910@gmail.com)

Here, we estimate energy source shift in the region and assign an energy code value to each well. Along with that, the scripts create a new scenario, where energy sources did not shift from what they were in 1994. In the folder there is a readme file that delves into more detail regarding the process.

04_Plotter: Here we have the script that created the plots for our manuscript

FPDIV_FInalFigurePlotter.py *Inputs needed: Palmer Drought index https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/statewide/time-series/14/pdsi/all/1/1994-2016

*Outputs from EnergySources

*S:\Users\mccar454\Project_Files\2017\WIMAS_CHP\Kansas_WIMAS.h5

05_Results: This folder contains a simplified version of the energy results.

AT_AE_Converted.csv This csv file contains the results from our actual observations of energy source and technology

AT_VE_Converted.csv This csv file contains the results from our actual technology observations and virtual ('static') energy source

VT_AE_Converted.csv This csv file contains our results from our Virtual ('static') technology change and actual energy change

VT_VE_Converted.csv This csv file contains our results from our Virtual ('static') energy and technology change

-In all of the mentioned csv files, columns are as follows:

FPDIVKEY: Unique well identifier energy_cd: 7 Wind 1 Electricity 2 Gasoline 3 Propane 4 Oil 5 Natural Gas 6 Diesel

FID: Indexer WUA_YEAR: year of use LONGITUDE: LATITUDE: LIFT_ENERGY: Direct energy needed at the farm (excluding pump and prime mover efficiency) in MJ/yr CEDTotal: Energy Footprint in MJ/yr (including pump and prime mover efficiency) GHGTotal: (kg CO2/yr)Total Greenhouse Gas emissionsbased on energy source from the energy footprint results.

FilterandCovnersion.py This script merges the results of FPDIV_WIMAS_ANALYSIS.py and EnergySources to output the final results.

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding author: Benjamin McCarthy, mccar454@msu.edu 288 Farm Lane, Room 207 Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1115

*This work is supported by INFEWS grant 2018-67003-27406 (accession No. 1013707) from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Developing Pathways Toward Sustainable Irrigation across the United States Using Process-based Systems Models (SIRUS). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USDA. Work by E.M.K. Haacker was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award 2016-68007-25066, Sustaining agriculture through adaptive management to preserve the Ogallala Aquifer under a changing climate.

Data Services

The following web services are available for data contained in this resource. Geospatial Feature and Raster data are made available via Open Geospatial Consortium Web Services. The provided links can be copied and pasted into GIS software to access these data. Multidimensional NetCDF data are made available via a THREDDS Data Server using remote data access protocols such as OPeNDAP. Other data services may be made available in the future to support additional data types.

Related Resources

This resource is referenced by McCarthy, B., Anex, R., Wang, Y., Kendall, A. D., Anctil, A., Haacker, E. M. K., & Hyndman, D. W. (2020). Trends in Water Use, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emissions from Irrigation: Role of Shifting Technologies and Energy Sources. Environmental Science & Technology, acs.est.0c02897. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02897
The content of this resource is derived from Cederstrand, Joel, and Mark Becker. Digital Map of Hydraulic Conductivity for High Plains Aquifer in Parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. 1998, doi:10.3133/ofr98548.Cederstrand, Joel, and Mark Becker. Digital Map of Hydraulic Conductivity for H
The content of this resource is derived from McGuire, V. L., et al. Specific Yield, High Plains Aquifer. 2012, http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20125177.
The content of this resource is derived from Haacker, Erin M. K., et al. “Water Level Declines in the High Plains Aquifer: Predevelopment to Resource Senescence.” Groundwater, vol. 54, no. 2, 2016, pp. 231–42, doi:10.1111/gwat.12350.
The content of this resource is derived from National Elevation Dataset - NAVD88 Meters - 1/3rd-Arc-Second (Approx. 10m). 2012, https://gisdata.nd.gov/Metadata/ISO/html/metadata_DEM_NED_10m.html#ID0EEBBGOA.
The content of this resource is derived from Qi, S. L. Digital Map of the Aquifer Boundary of the High Plains Aquifer in Parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 543. 2010, https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/543/.
The content of this resource is derived from https://www.waterqualitydata.us/portal/#countrycode=US&statecode=US%3A20&sampleMedia=Water&characteristicName=Bicarbonate&providers=NWIS&providers=STORET&mimeType=csv
The content of this resource is derived from Palmer Drought index https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/statewide/time-series/14/pdsi/all/1/1994-2016
The content of this resource is derived from Wilson, B., Bartley, J., Emmons, K., Bagley, J., Wason, J., & Stankiewicz, S. (2005). Water Information Management and Analysis System, Version 5, for the Web. User Manual. Kansas Geological Survey Open File Report 2005-30., 37.

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name Award Title Award Number
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Developing Pathways Toward Sustainable Irrigation across the United States Using Process-based Systems Models (SIRUS) 2018-67003-27406 (accession No. 1013707)
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Sustaining agriculture through adaptive management to preserve the Ogallala Aquifer under a changing climate 2016-68007-25066

How to Cite

McCarthy, B. M., R. Anex, Y. Wang, A. D. Kendall, A. Anctil, D. W. Hyndman, E. Haacker (2020). MATERIALS AND METHODS USED FOR "Trends in Water Use, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emissions from Irrigation: Role of Shifting Technologies and Energy Source", HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.211ed5225921483388cc0ee023563a30

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required