Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

GroMoPo Metadata for Tivoli-Guidonia basin model


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 1.5 KB
Created: Feb 08, 2023 at 3:35 p.m.
Last updated: Feb 08, 2023 at 3:35 p.m.
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Public
Views: 569
Downloads: 212
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

With respect to model parameterization and sensitivity analysis, this work uses a practical example to suggest that methods that start with simple models and use computationally frugal model analysis methods remain valuable in any toolbox of model development methods. In this work, ground-water model calibration starts with a simple parameterization that evolves into a moderately complex model. The model is developed for a water management study of the TivoliGuidonia basin (Rome, Italy) where surface mining has been conducted in conjunction with substantial dewatering. The approach to model development used in this work employs repeated analysis using sensitivity and inverse methods, including use of a new observation-stacked parameter importance graph. The methods are highly parallelizable and require few model runs, which make the repeated analyses and attendant insights possible. The success of a model development design can be measured by insights attained and demonstrated model accuracy relevant to predictions. Example insights were obtained: (1) A long-held belief that, except for a few distinct fractures, the travertine is homogeneous was found to be inadequate, and (2) The dewatering pumping rate is more critical to model accuracy than expected. The latter insight motivated additional data collection and improved pumpage estimates. Validation tests using three other recharge and pumpage conditions suggest good accuracy for the predictions considered. The model was used to evaluate management scenarios and showed that similar dewatering results could be achieved using 20 % less pumped water, but would require installing newly positioned wells and cooperation between mine owners.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Italy
North Latitude
41.9600°
East Longitude
12.6800°
South Latitude
41.9000°
West Longitude
12.5800°

Content

Additional Metadata

Name Value
DOI 10.1007/s10040-016-1393-z
Depth
Scale 11 - 101 km²
Layers 3
Purpose
GroMoPo_ID 316
IsVerified True
Model Code MODFLOW
Model Link https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1393-z
Model Time SS
Model Year 2016
Model Authors La Vigna, F; Hill, MC; Rossetto, R; Mazza, R
Model Country Italy
Data Available Report/paper only
Developer Email francesco.lavigna@comune.roma.it
Dominant Geology Carbonate (including karst)
Developer Country Italy; USA
Publication Title Parameterization, sensitivity analysis, and inversion: an investigation using groundwater modeling of the surface-mined Tivoli-Guidonia basin (Metropolitan City of Rome, Italy)
Original Developer No
Additional Information
Integration or Coupling None of the above
Evaluation or Calibration Static water levels
Geologic Data Availability No

How to Cite

GroMoPo, S. Ruzzante (2023). GroMoPo Metadata for Tivoli-Guidonia basin model, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/215b7c78fca646c5ac3ae52d324ebd88

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required