Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Simulation Data from Rice et al. (2020), Numerical investigation of wellbore methane leakage from a dual-porosity reservoir and subsequent transport in groundwater
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 95.1 MB | |
Created: | Aug 21, 2020 at 10:39 p.m. | |
Last updated: | Nov 23, 2020 at 11 p.m. (Metadata update) | |
Published date: | Nov 23, 2020 at 11 p.m. | |
DOI: | 10.4211/hs.290ba9fc5b654f9f90ff59bafa5bfe98 | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Published |
---|---|
Views: | 1347 |
Downloads: | 72 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Three‐dimensional, multiphase simulations are used to analyze migration of methane leakage from a hydrocarbon wellbore. The objective is to evaluate the relevance and importance of coupling fast, advective transport of methane through fractures with slower, diffusive transport in the shale matrix below a freshwater aquifer on water quality assuming dual‐domain mass transfer (DDMT) in the reservoir by using the Multiple Interacting Continua (MINC) as implemented in TOUGH2. The conceptual model includes a methane gas‐phase leak from a wellbore 20‐30 m below an aquifer; multiphase, buoyant transport through shale partially saturated with brine; and, after methane leakage reaches groundwater, multiphase transport under varying lateral groundwater flow gradients. Results suggest that DDMT affects the rate of methane reaching groundwater by (i) providing long‐time secondary storage in less‐mobile pore space and (ii) creating larger methane‐plume diameters than those predicted by a single‐domain advection‐diffusion equation. Compared to models without DDMT, these factors combine to increase methane flow rates by an order of magnitude across the base of the aquifer 100 years after leakage begins. In the simulated aquifer, dissolution of gas‐phase plumes leads to bimodal aqueous‐phase methane breakthrough curves in a simulated water well 100 m downstream from leakage, with peak concentrations appearing decades after a one‐year pulse of leakage. The major implication is that DDMT in the reservoir can explain newly discovered methane concentrations in water wells attributable to older leakage events. Therefore, remediation of abandoned or legacy wells with wellbore integrity loss may be necessary to prevent future incidents of groundwater contamination.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Temporal
Start Date: | |
---|---|
End Date: |
Content
Related Resources
This resource is referenced by | Rice, A.K., McCray, J.E. and Singha, K. (2020). Numerical investigation of wellbore methane leakage from a dual-porosity reservoir and subsequent transport in groundwater. Water Resources Research, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026991 |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercial CC BY-NC.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment