Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 362.2 MB | |
Created: | Apr 11, 2025 at 4:28 a.m. | |
Last updated: | Apr 11, 2025 at 4:48 a.m. | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Public |
---|---|
Views: | 21 |
Downloads: | 0 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
High-resolution digital elevation models (HRDEMs), derived from LiDAR, are widely used for mapping hydrographic details in flat terrains. However, artificial flow barriers, particularly from roads, elevate terrain and prematurely end flowlines. Drainage barrier processing (DBP), such as HRDEM excavation, is employed to address this issue. However, there is a gap in quantitatively assessing the impact of DBP on HRDEM-derived flowlines, especially at finer scales. This study fills that gap by quantitatively assessing how DBP improves flowline quality at finer scales. We evaluated HRDEM-derived flowlines that were generated using different flow direction algorithms, developing a framework to measure the effects of flow barrier removal. The results show that the primary factor influencing flowline quality is the presence of flow accumulation artifacts. Quality issues also stem from differences between natural and artificial flow paths, unrealistic flowlines in flat areas, complex canal networks, and ephemeral drainage ways. Notably, the improvement achieved by DBP is demonstrated to be more than 6%, showcasing its efficacy in reducing the impact of flow barriers on hydrologic connectivity.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
Name | Value |
---|---|
Flat Creek Watershed Hydrography Dataset | This dataset includes high-resolution DEMs and multi-scale hydrographic datasets documented in the journal article: Wu, D., R. Li, M. Edidem, G. Wang. 2024, Enhancing Hydrologic LiDAR Digital Elevation Models: Bridging Hydrographic Gaps at Fine Scales. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 60(6), 1253-1269. |
Related Geospatial Features
This HydroShare resource is linked to the following geospatial features
Learn more about Related Geospatial Features
We highly recommend that you add Spatial Coverage to this resource before searching for related geospatial features. Otherwise query times can be excessive.
${value.text} | ${value.text} |
Click a point to search for features that overlap with that location.
Select a feature for more information.
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
---|---|---|
U.S. National Science Foundation | Enhancing High-resolution Terrain Data Model for Improving the Delineation of Multi-scale Hydrological Connectivity | 1951741 |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment