Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Understanding the impact of precipitation bias-correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 5.0 GB
Created: Oct 09, 2023 at 5:12 p.m.
Last updated: Mar 04, 2024 at 9:31 p.m. (Metadata update)
Published date: Mar 04, 2024 at 9:31 p.m.
DOI: 10.4211/hs.45930399530b42c391e642f3c5202a8d
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Published
Views: 374
Downloads: 56
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

This contains the data and codes for the study: "Understanding the impact of precipitation bias-correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes" by Michalek et. al. (2023). The code for the analysis is provided below. The file name provided the order of the steps taken for the analysis. Note any precipitation related files are not included as they are too large for Hydroshare. Abstract: This study evaluates five bias correction and statistical downscaling (BCSD) techniques for daily precipitation and examines their impacts on the projected changes in flood extremes (i.e., 1%, 0.5%, and 0.2% floods). We use climate model outputs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) to conduct hydrologic simulations across watersheds in Iowa and determine historical and future flood extreme estimates based on generalized extreme value distribution fitting. Projected changes in these extremes are examined with respect to four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) alongside five BCSD techniques. We find the magnitude of future annual exceedance probability (AEPs) estimates are expected to increase for the future under all SSPs, especially for the emission scenarios with higher greenhouse gases concentrations (i.e., SSP370 and SSP585). Our results also suggest the choice of BCSD impacts the magnitude of the projected changes, with the SSPs that exert limited sensitivity compared to the choice of downscaling method. The variability in projected flood changes across Iowa is similar across the downscaling technique but increases as the AEP increases. Our findings provide insights into the impact of downscaling techniques on flood extremes’ projections and useful information for climate planning across the state.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Iowa
North Latitude
43.7532°
East Longitude
-89.9231°
South Latitude
40.2439°
West Longitude
-96.8665°

Temporal

Start Date:
End Date:

Content

readme.txt

# Michalek et al. (2024)

Hydroshare containing code and data for: 
	Michalek, A. T., Villarini, G., & Kim, T. (2024). Understanding the impact of precipitation bias‐correction and statistical downscaling methods on 	projected changes in flood extremes. Earth's Future, 12, e2023EF004179. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004179. 

The contents below contain information on the code and data. The codes are labeled based in the order to run (i.e. step1, step2, etc....)

## Data

-HLM Folder
This folder contains the flood peak data for all simulations in the csv file for the locations of interest. The setup folder contains the files used to run the HLM model with the source code available at: https://github.com/ssmall41/asynch

-USGS Folder
This folder contains a CSV file containing all the annual flood peaks for USGS locations in Iowa. The second csv contains the metadata for the gages. 

## Analysis

This folder contains all of the analysis steps for the paper. 

-distfit
In this folder the codes to fit the distributions for the observed and simulated data (step 1) and get the confidence intervals (step 2) are contained. Next the  steps to plot the AEP and quantile change boxplots are provided (steps 5 and 6). 

-precip
Codes to process and plot the SDII by basin (Steps 7 to 9). Note the raw data for precipiation is note provided as it was a few terabytes. Step 7 was used to process the netcdf files with downscaled precipitation. The results of that step are provided in zip files in this directory for each climate model. 

-validation
Codes for validation of distribution fitting analysis based on USGS data (steps 3 and 4). 

## Figures

Figures from the manuscript. 

Related Resources

This resource is referenced by Michalek, A. T., Villarini, G., & Kim, T. (2024). Understanding the impact of precipitation bias‐correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes. Earth's Future, 12, e2023EF004179. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004179

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name Award Title Award Number
Iowa Department of Transportation
U.S. Department of Defense

How to Cite

Michalek, A. (2024). Understanding the impact of precipitation bias-correction and statistical downscaling methods on projected changes in flood extremes, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.45930399530b42c391e642f3c5202a8d

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required