Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Supporting Data and Code for "Evaluating the U.S. National Water Model Retrospective Evapotranspiration Simulation using Eddy-Covariance Flux Tower Measurements"
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 247.7 MB | |
| Created: | Aug 09, 2024 at 8:12 a.m. (UTC) | |
| Last updated: | Aug 05, 2025 at 5:56 a.m. (UTC) | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 1003 |
| Downloads: | 4 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
This HydroShare resource contains the data, Python scripts, and documentation used in the study titled "Evaluating the U.S. National Water Model Retrospective Evapotranspiration Simulation using Eddy-Covariance Flux Tower Measurements" by Chapagain, Maghami, and Ames. The study assesses monthly evapotranspiration (ET) outputs from the National Water Model (NWM) retrospective simulation across 72 AmeriFlux tower sites representing a range of climate zones, land cover types, and hydrologic regimes within the contiguous United States. The resource includes:
1- Preprocessed ET and meteorological data from NWM and AmeriFlux
2- Analysis scripts for computing performance metrics (e.g., Scaled KGE, PBIAS)
3- Group-wise evaluation by RFC, Köppen-Geiger climate zone, and land use
4- Visualization code for reproducible plots in the manuscript
5- Regime classification and temperature bias assessments
Note: The majority of analysis and visualization steps are provided as Jupyter notebooks, which were run locally in a Python environment. Most results can be reproduced with the included scripts, though some raw input data or dependencies may require additional setup. Additionally, ArcGIS Pro was used primarily for generating the map showing site locations and their hydroclimatic attributes.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment