Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Baltimore Stream Restoration: Assessments of Environmental, Willingness to Pay, and Social Suitability


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 11.7 MB
Created: Mar 11, 2026 at 4:51 p.m. (UTC)
Last updated: Mar 12, 2026 at 10:17 p.m. (UTC)
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Content types: CSV Content 
Sharing Status: Public
Views: 96
Downloads: 7
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

Reducing nitrogen delivery to coastal waters is a “wicked problem” involving tradeoffs in environmental, economic and social need domains. Because these tradeoffs arise from spatial and temporal complexities in sources and sinks of this element, we hypothesized that a transdisciplinary focus on disproportionality could allow for the identification of “hot” or “sweet” spots where multiple factors converge to create opportunities to control nitrogen flux. We applied this approach to the Baltimore, MD USA region by mapping stream reaches with high nitrogen concentrations, hydrologic conditions amenable to stream restoration, high willingness to pay for restoration projects, and high social need for restoration, and subsequently identifying locations where these factors converge to create sweet spots. Our analysis suggests that sweet spots that optimize environmental, economic, and social need components of sustainability may be rare. The desire to bundle multiple benefits in the budgeting for environmental interventions such as stream restoration may create a sub-optimal distribution of these interventions in a sustainability context.

The repository:
The repository includes data stream-level nitrogen reduction post-stream restoration, willingness to pay (WTP) from households within 1 mile of stream midpoints, and associated census factors within the 1-mi buffer. Estimates of stream nitrogen concentrations from the SPARROW model (https://sparrow.wim.usgs.gov/sparrow-northeast-2012) within our study area are also included. A Jupyter Notebook contains code for processing and generating figures of the study. Check "README.docx" file for details.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Baltimore
North Latitude
39.6343°
East Longitude
-76.3168°
South Latitude
39.1664°
West Longitude
-76.9215°

Content

README.md

The repository contains python code (FigurePlotting_DataProcessing.ipynb) and data that Groffman et al. (2026) used.

Code

FigurePlotting_DataProcessing.ipynb:

  • This Jupyter Notebook detailed how figures were created using the data from SPARROW TN concentration, willingness to pay (WTP) from stream restoration with forest and boulder landscape, and social need index derived from census data.
  • Comments/notes within the notebook explained how each variable is calculated and classified.
  • Geospatial visualizations were produced using the Contextily library. The basemap utilizes the CartoDB Positron style, which incorporates data from OpenStreetMap contributors and is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) license.

Tabular Data (./Data)

WTP_stream_seg.csv

Total WTP for design and per lb of N reduction from all households with 1-mi buffer from stream segments (see shapefiles/Stream_seg.json) delineated in Baltimore.

Name Description
fid Identifier for stream reaches
FREQUENCY Number of households inside 1-mi buffer
SUM_pub_WTP_FB Total WTP for forest and boulder on public land
SUM_pri_WTP_FB Total WTP for forest and boulder on private land
SUM_pub_WTP_GB Total WTP for grass and boulder on public land
SUM_pri_WTP_GB Total WTP for grass and boulder on private land
SUM_pub_WTP_N_red WTP for per lb of N reduction on public land
SUM_pri_WTP_N_red WTP for per lb of N reduction on private land

Social_Need_Index.csv

Social need index derived by area-averaging census information (population density, vegetation cover, median household income, and median property value) within the 1-mi buffer from midpoint of each stream segment.

Name Description
fid_1 Identifier for stream reaches
SUM_Weighted_Index Sum of individual social index

Shapefiles

Stream_seg.json (n = 4,596)

Delineated stream segments (~1000 ft) using 10-m DEM data (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/681c128bd4be0260c2c465b4) from USGS. Stream network is delineated using r.watershed (https://grass.osgeo.org/grass-stable/manuals/r.watershed.html) tool in GRASS GIS.

Name Description
stream_fid Identifier for stream reaches
strahler_order Strahler stream order
pct_public_buffer % public land within 100-m of stream reach
household_count Number of households within 1-m of stream midpoint
f75 Stream flashiness (Shields et al. (2008))

Sparrow_NE_BAL.json (n = 609)

SPARROW total nitrogen concentration (from USGS’s 2012 Northeast dataset, https://sparrow.wim.usgs.gov/sparrow-northeast-2012).

Name Description
COMID Identifier of NHDPlus stream
GNIS_NAME Name of stream
ne_sparrow Total nitrogen concentration (mg/L)
quintiles Quintile group labels

Administrative Boundaries and Spatial Data

  • BALT_City.shp: Baltimore City boundary (https://data.imap.maryland.gov/datasets/2315ef0b071a4ec59420e3d342dbcfe2_0).
  • BALT_County.shp : Baltimore County boundary (https://data.imap.maryland.gov/datasets/2315ef0b071a4ec59420e3d342dbcfe2_0).
  • URDL.shp : Urban-Rural Demarcation Line (https://opendata.baltimorecountymd.gov/datasets/BC-GIS::urban-rural-demarcation-line).
  • MergedWatersheds.gpkg: Three major watersheds, Gwynns Falls, Jones Falls, and Herring Run, in Baltimore, delineated from USGS 10-m DEM using GRASS GIS's r.watershed.

References

Shields, C. A., Band, L. E., Law, N., Groffman, P. M., Kaushal, S. S., Savvas, K., Fisher, G. T., & Belt, K. T. (2008). Streamflow distribution of non–point source nitrogen export from urban‐rural catchments in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Water Resources Research, 44(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006360

Related Resources

This resource is described by Rosenberg, A. B., Newburn, D. A., & Towe, C. A. (2022). Household willingness to pay for stream restoration on private and public land: Evidence from the Baltimore metropolitan region. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13089
This resource is described by Zhang, R., Newburn, D., Rosenberg, A., Lin, L., Groffman, P., Duncan, J., & Band, L. (2022). Spatial Asynchrony in environmental and economic benefits of stream restoration. Environmental Research Letters, 17(5), 054004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac61c6
This resource is described by Shields, C. A., Band, L. E., Law, N., Groffman, P. M., Kaushal, S. S., Savvas, K., Fisher, G. T., & Belt, K. T. (2008). Streamflow distribution of non–point source nitrogen export from urban‐rural catchments in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Water Resources Research, 44(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006360
The content of this resource is derived from Zhang, R. (2026). Baltimore Stream Restoration: Assessments of Environmental, Willingness to Pay, and Social Suitability, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/2eb09e65cde84162a9a5fdeb580b7623, accessed on: 03/11/2026

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name Award Title Award Number
U.S. National Science Foundation Coastal Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability EAR-1426819
U.S. National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research DEB-1855277
U.S. National Science Foundation Long Term Research in Environmental Biology DEB-2123318
United States Department of Agriculture None None

Contributors

People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.

Name Organization Address Phone Author Identifiers
Lawrence Band University of Virginia Virginia, US
David A. Newburn University of Maryland
J. Morgan Grove USDA Forest Service
Andrew Miller University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Andrew Rosenberg USDA Economic Research Service
Charles Towe University of Connecticut
Dexter Locke USDA Forest Service
Ruoyu Zhang University of Virginia Virginia, US
Alexander Reisinger University of Florida
Jon Duncan Penn State University PA, US
Peter Groffman City University of New York;Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies New York, US

How to Cite

Zhang, R. (2026). Baltimore Stream Restoration: Assessments of Environmental, Willingness to Pay, and Social Suitability, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/593f96cc79cb4062b70503c1ac37f761

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required