Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Geophysical mapping of hyporheic processes controlled by sedimentary architecture within compound bar deposits
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 8.8 MB | |
Created: | Feb 01, 2021 at 9:32 p.m. | |
Last updated: | Sep 01, 2021 at 5:02 p.m. (Metadata update) | |
Published date: | Sep 01, 2021 at 5:01 p.m. | |
DOI: | 10.4211/hs.69204f1ee49c4176a8aab5f4832c7b76 | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Published |
---|---|
Views: | 1099 |
Downloads: | 44 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Hyporheic exchange influences water quality and controls numerous physical, chemical, and biological processes. Despite its importance, hyporheic exchange and the associated dynamics of solute mixing are often difficult to characterize due to spatial (e.g., sedimentary heterogeneity) and temporal (e.g., river stage fluctuation) variabilities. This study coupled geophysical techniques with physical and chemical sediment analyses to map sedimentary architecture and quantify its influence on hyporheic exchange dynamics within a compound bar deposit in a gravel‐dominated river system in southwestern Ohio. Electromagnetic induction (EMI) was used to quantify variability in electrical conductivity within the compound bar. EMI informed locations of electrode placement for time‐lapse electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) surveys, which were used to examine changes in electrical resistivity driven by hyporheic exchange. Both geophysical methods revealed a zone of high electrical conductivity in the centre of the bar, identified as a fine‐grained cross‐bar channel fill. The zone acts as a baffle to flow, evidenced by stable electrical conditions measured by time‐lapse ERI over the study period. Large changes in electrical resistivity throughout the survey period indicate preferential flowpaths through higher permeability sands and gravels. Grain size analyses confirmed sedimentological interpretations of geophysical data. Loss on ignition and x‐ray fluorescence identified zones with higher organic matter content that are locations for potentially enhanced geochemical activity within the cross‐bar channel fill. Differences in the physical and geochemical characteristics of cross‐bar channel fills play an important role in hyporheic flow dynamics and nutrient processing within riverbed sediments. These findings enhance our understanding of the applications of geophysical methods in mapping riverbed heterogeneity and highlight the importance of accurately representing geomorphologic features and heterogeneity when studying hyporheic exchange processes.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
Start Date: | |
---|---|
End Date: |
Content
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
---|---|---|
University of Cincinnati |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment