Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.6 KB | |
| Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 8:32 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 8:32 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 530 |
| Downloads: | 212 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Reliable groundwater model predictions are dependent on representative models of the geological environment, which can be modelled using several different techniques. In order to inform the choice of the geological modelling technique, the differences between a layer modelling approach and a voxel modelling approach were analyzed. The layer model consists of stratigraphically ordered surfaces, while the voxel model consists of a structured mesh of volumetric pixels. Groundwater models based on the two models were developed to investigate their impact on groundwater model predictions. The study was conducted in the relatively data-dense area Egebjerg, Denmark, where both a layer model and a voxel model have been developed based on the same data and geological conceptualization. The characteristics of the two methodologies for developing the geological models were shown to have a direct impact on the resulting models. The differences between the layer and the voxel models were, however, shown to be diverse and not related to larger conceptual elements, with few exceptions. The analysis showed that the geological modelling approaches had an influence on preferred parameter values and thereby groundwater model predictions of hydraulic head, groundwater budget terms and particle tracking results. A significance test taking into account the predictive distributions showed, that for many predictions, the differences between the models were significant. The results suggest that the geological modelling strategy has an influence on groundwater model predictions even if based on the same geological conceptualization.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10040-021-02442-9 |
| Depth | |
| Scale | 101 - 1 000 km² |
| Layers | |
| Purpose | Scientific investigation (not related to applied problem) |
| GroMoPo_ID | 416 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | Unknown |
| Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02442-9 |
| Model Time | |
| Model Year | 2022 |
| Model Authors | Enemark, T; Andersen, LT; Hoyer, AS; Jensen, KH; Kidmose, J; Sandersen, PBE; Sonnenborg, TO |
| Model Country | Denmark |
| Data Available | Report/paper only |
| Developer Email | khj@ign.ku.dk |
| Dominant Geology | Model focuses on multiple geologic materials |
| Developer Country | Denmark |
| Publication Title | The influence of layer and voxel geological modelling strategy on groundwater modelling results |
| Original Developer | No |
| Additional Information | Comparison of modeling concepts based on layers and voxels |
| Integration or Coupling | |
| Evaluation or Calibration | Unsure |
| Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment