Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 10.7 KB | |
| Created: | Jan 22, 2023 at 3:01 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Jan 23, 2023 at 1:35 p.m. (Metadata update) | |
| Published date: | Jan 23, 2023 at 1:35 p.m. | |
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.75d565f76a9c4f04990b1538201010d1 | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 649 |
| Downloads: | 29 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Increased wildfire activity in the western US can lead to detrimental cascading effects to water quality. After fires, burned areas may experience significant runoff-induced erosion and sediment transport into rivers and reservoirs, which could rapidly overwhelm existing drinking water treatment plants. This paper couples an assessment of wildfire risk with an evaluation of water utility preparedness to understand where key fire-related drinking water vulnerabilities exist. Wildfire risk assessments were constructed based on existing methodologies described in the academic literature to assess fire impacts in watersheds used by water utilities. A water utility preparedness index was created for this study using publicly available information to contextualize how well utilities may be able to respond to water quality degradation after fires. Based on the available data, results indicate that roughly one-third of utilities studied (representing 12% of the population served) were underprepared for fire and one-third used watersheds at greater risk of wildfire (representing 26% of the population served). However, only four utilities (2% of the population served) were likely underprepared and at greater risk of fire. The information developed here could provide a useful framework from which utility managers can better assess their likely wildfire risk and preparation plans relative to others should a fire occur.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Related Resources
| This resource has been replaced by a newer version | Robichaud, P. (2023). Drinking Water Under Fire: Water Utilities’ Vulnerability to Wildfires in the Pacific Northwest, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/c874f49441144c1791d717c528092c8e |
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
| Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
|---|---|---|
| NASA | NASA Water Resources Program | 80NSSC19K1197 |
Contributors
People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.
| Name | Organization | Address | Phone | Author Identifiers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Padowski | Washington State University | WA, US | 5093358539 |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment