Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.5 KB | |
Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 7:55 p.m. | |
Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 7:56 p.m. | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Public |
---|---|
Views: | 564 |
Downloads: | 219 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
An example of groundwater resources evaluation methodology by numerical modeling in the complex, unconsolidated, multi-aquifer system of the Swidnica area (similar to 627 km(2)) is presented. In this study Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) was used to develop a conceptual model on the basis of data from several hundred boreholes and to calibrate a numerical, multi-aquifer model. A steady state calibration was performed using historical natural groundwater table (quasi-natural simulation) data and abundant pumping test transmissivity data. The calibrated recharge was first spatially distributed based on surface lithology and then adjusted until a good match between calculated and measured heads was obtained. The quasi-natural simulation budget input of similar to 165,000 m(3)/day consisted of 40.5% of lateral inflow from the SW fault model boundary, 34.5% of average net recharge from precipitation, 13% of infiltration from the Mietkowskie Lake and 12% of river infiltration. The budget output (the same as input) consisted of similar to 88% of river drainage and similar to 12% of lateral outflow. The final, abstraction-influenced simulation representing the current stationary condition was used to verify the model by cross referencing present well drawdowns with well abstractions and by comparison of the groundwater discharge to the rivers with the field baseflow measurements. In this simulation, the total well abstraction of similar to 53,000 m(3)/d resulted in 9% increase in overall water balance up to similar to 180,000 m(3)/day, 38% increased river infiltration, 24% reduced river drainage, 17% reduced lateral outflow and similar to 3 times increased downward leakage to the deepest, productive aquifer. The Swidnica study case shows an example, which analyzes an impact of well abstractions on the decline of groundwater table and river discharges, concluding that reserves of renewable water resources are still available. It shows also, that by setting up a conceptual model within the numerical model environment and by applying a quasi-3D solution, complex multi-aquifer systems can be well and efficiently modeled.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
Name | Value |
---|---|
DOI | 10.1007/s10040-004-0382-9 |
Depth | 80 |
Scale | 101 - 1 000 km² |
Layers | |
Purpose | Groundwater resources |
GroMoPo_ID | 390 |
IsVerified | True |
Model Code | MODFLOW |
Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0382-9 |
Model Time | 3 |
Model Year | 2005 |
Model Authors | Gurwin, J; Lubczynski, M |
Model Country | Poland |
Data Available | Report/paper only |
Developer Email | jgur@ing.uni.wroc.pl |
Dominant Geology | Model focuses on multiple geologic materials |
Developer Country | Poland |
Publication Title | Modeling of complex multi-aquifer systems for groundwater resources evaluation - Swidnica study case (Poland) |
Original Developer | No |
Additional Information | |
Integration or Coupling | Surface water;Water use |
Evaluation or Calibration | Static water levels;Static pumping rates |
Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment