Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 16.2 MB | |
Created: | Feb 28, 2023 at 3:43 p.m. | |
Last updated: | Sep 25, 2023 at 1 p.m. (Metadata update) | |
Published date: | Sep 25, 2023 at 1 p.m. | |
DOI: | 10.4211/hs.8e35713f7ac04f2a8e628fa58b54da44 | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Published |
---|---|
Views: | 414 |
Downloads: | 6 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Clogging of streambeds due to clay deposition influences the stream-subsurface exchange flux and thus directly modulates hyporheic ecological and biogeochemical processes. Clogging of sandy streambeds has previously been studied under losing and gaining flows and during streambed movement, but not when these two flow conditions coincided. We conducted flume experiments to quantify the combined effect of moving bedforms and losing or gaining flows on kaolinite deposition and streambed clogging. The experiments were conducted by adding pulses of kaolinite in a flume packed with sand under a streamwater velocity of 25 cm/s. We measured the deposition rates, dynamics of hyporheic exchange flux (HEF) and vertical hydraulic conductivity (Kv), and the vertical distribution of kaolinite at the end of the experiments under two losing and two gaining flows (Darcy velocity of 10 and 20 cm/day). Kaolinite deposition led to clogging and reduction in Kv and HEF under all flow conditions. Deposition occurred faster under losing flow conditions than under gaining flow conditions. However, the changes in Kv and HEF were similar under losing and gaining flow conditions for similar kaolinite concentrations in the bed. Our results indicate that the deposition patterns of kaolinite were more influenced by bedform movement than by losing or gaining flow conditions. This implies that bedform morphodynamics control local-scale clogging of sandy streambeds and should be accounted for when studying the hydrology of catchments at larger scales.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Readme.txt
Non-standard variable names and notations: G10 - "Gaining Flux of 10 cm/day" G20 - "Gaining Flux of 20 cm/day" L10 - "Losing Flux of 10 cm/day" L20 - "Losing Flux of 20 cm/day" set1 / exp1 - Measurements taken during the first of two replications set2 / exp2 - Measurements taken during the second of two replications
Credits
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment