Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Predicting road-crossing passability for river connectivity analysis


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 60.9 MB
Created: Feb 10, 2025 at 5:32 p.m.
Last updated: Feb 10, 2025 at 8:44 p.m.
Published date: Feb 10, 2025 at 8:44 p.m.
DOI: 10.4211/hs.90e9ae2832334b5395499545788886bc
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Content types: CSV Content 
Sharing Status: Published
Views: 163
Downloads: 0
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

Data, code, and figures supporting the manuscript "Predicting road-crossing passability for river connectivity analysis" (Goodrum et al, 2025)
/Data - Raw data used in analysis
/Analysis - Code for processing data and generating results and figures
/Figures - PDF files of manuscript figures

Abstract:
Road-crossing structures limit organism movement but their passabilities are rarely measured because they are numerous and time-consuming to survey. Instead, road crossing passability could be treated in one of four ways: assuming equal passability at all locations (uniform method), assigning random passability values sample from barrier surveys (random sample method), or using remote sensing data to infer presence (presence/absence method) or rate passability (rating category method). Each prediction method produces different passability estimates for individual barriers, but how these differences affect river connectivity estimates has not been systematically evaluated. We compared river connectivity estimates from these four road-crossing passability prediction methods in the Bear River Basin, USA. We parameterized barrier passability methods with Bonneville Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii utah passage survey data at 140 road crossings. Road crossings blocked fish passage at 37% of survey locations. Those road-crossing barriers that obstructed fish movement also decreased the proportion of connected reaches in the river network from 12% (with dams and all road crossings assumed to be passable), to just 3%. All passability prediction methods produced similar results and had considerable uncertainty predicting passability for individual barriers. Our findings suggest that more simple methods, like uniform or random sample road-crossing passability predictions are sufficient to characterize river connectivity. Our work highlights the importance of identifying road crossings that act as barriers to organism passage and identifies critical limitations to predicting barrier status for connectivity analysis and conservation planning.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Bear River Basin
North Latitude
42.7048°
East Longitude
-110.5060°
South Latitude
40.6037°
West Longitude
-112.7802°

Content

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name Award Title Award Number
National Science Foundation CAREER: Robust aquatic habitat representation for water resources decision-making 1653452
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2021-69012-35916

How to Cite

Goodrum, G., S. Null (2025). Predicting road-crossing passability for river connectivity analysis, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.90e9ae2832334b5395499545788886bc

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required