Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.5 KB | |
Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 8:56 p.m. | |
Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 8:56 p.m. | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Public |
---|---|
Views: | 564 |
Downloads: | 228 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Groundwater flow modeling was carried out to assess current and to project future groundwater scenarios in highly populated and water stressed region of Ganges sub-basin. Both the urban and rural densely populated areas of Ganges sub-basin was selected to capture the groundwater usage patterns in these watersheds. The groundwater system geologically consists of sand and clay layers. However, the layers are not stratified and has highly variable thicknesses and at places various layers disappears. Therefore, a 3D model was prepared so that variability in the vertical direction is also taken care. The study area modeled is divided into grids with 37 rows and 37 columns with 1 km size. The month of June 2016 was taken to perform the steady-state simulation as June has the lowest groundwater levels as well as the minimum stress on the aquifer. Subsequently the Transient state calibration was carried out from June 2016 to November 2018. A good match is obtained between calculated and observed heads in steady state conditions after a rigorous calibration with RMS error as 1.822 m. The sensitivity analysis of the model shows that the model is more sensitive to input parameters like recharge and hydraulic conductivity. The prediction scenarios were developed for a period of 10 years from 2018 to 2028 using the local conditions of groundwater utilization as well as projected rainfall. The rise in water level in rural areas is observed resulting from artificial sources like canal recharge and irrigation return flows from irrigated lands. The rise in groundwater level is in the range of 0.13-0.31 m/year in Scenario I and 0.11-0.47 m/year in Scenario II. The decline in groundwater levels is noticed in urban areas which are a result of heavy domestic and industrial groundwater withdrawal and absence of recharge areas. The decline in groundwater level is in the range of 0.12-0.31 m/year in Scenario I and 0.24-0.33 m/year in Scenario II.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
Name | Value |
---|---|
DOI | 10.1007/s12594-021-1793-0 |
Depth | 125 |
Scale | 1 001 - 10 000 km² |
Layers | 7 |
Purpose | Groundwater resources |
GroMoPo_ID | 425 |
IsVerified | True |
Model Code | MODFLOW |
Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-021-1793-0 |
Model Time | 2016-2018 |
Model Year | 2021 |
Model Authors | Ansari, AHM; Umar, R; Saba, NU; Sarah, S |
Model Country | India |
Data Available | Report/paper only |
Developer Email | rashidumar@rediffmail.com |
Dominant Geology | Siliciclastic sedimentary (sandstones, shales) |
Developer Country | India |
Publication Title | Assessment of Current and Future Groundwater Stress through Varied Scenario Projections in Urban and Rural Environment in Parts of Meerut District, Uttar Pradesh in Ganges Sub-basin |
Original Developer | No |
Additional Information | |
Integration or Coupling | None of the above |
Evaluation or Calibration | Dynamic water levels |
Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment