Checking for missing content type metadata ...
This resource contains content types with missing metadata required to make it public or discoverable. Show missing content type metadata.
Click on the edit button ( ) below to edit this resource.
Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 848.3 MB | |
| Created: | Oct 27, 2026 at 4:53 a.m. (UTC) | |
| Last updated: | Oct 29, 2026 at 1:23 a.m. (UTC) (Metadata update) | |
| Published date: | Oct 29, 2026 at 1:23 a.m. (UTC) | |
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.99080b48206e4b2c82e716516d463a61 | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource | |
| Content types: | Geographic Feature Content Geographic Raster Content CSV Content |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 271 |
| Downloads: | 437 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Sub-Saharan Africa has experienced both rapid population growth and loss of arable land due to soil degradation, leading to the expansion of agriculture into savanna ecosystems. Sustainable agricultural intensification has been promoted to reduce expansion into native ecosystems while minimizing impacts of increased agricultural inputs on existing farmland. However, there are few high-resolution spatiotemporal datasets available to evaluate existing agroecosystem conditions and proposed management scenarios at the upstream edge of natural savanna ecosystems. The dataset presented here contains daily and sub-daily streamflow and precipitation data, soil physicochemical properties, and farm management data collected from the Nanyuki River watershed in the Mount Kenya region of the Upper Ewaso Ng’iro basin (Laikipia, Meru, and Nyeri counties) from 2021-2024. Derived products include stream channels, subwatersheds and their attributes, and 10 m land cover and curve number layers that distinguish large farms from smallholder fields. The datasets provide comprehensive information for calibrating and evaluating hydrologic, ecosystem, and agricultural models at daily and sub-daily time steps.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
| Start Date: | |
|---|---|
| End Date: |
Content
README.md
Hydrology, soils and watershed data for the Nanyuki River watershed, Laikipia, Meru, and Nyeri counties, Kenya (2021–2024)
Field observations from the northwestern slopes of Mount Kenya, at the edge of the savanna:
- Streamflow: stage at eight gauges (CA01–CA08) and discharge with 95% uncertainty bounds at seven of them (CA02–CA08), at 5-minute, hourly and daily time steps, July 2021 – January 2024.
- Rainfall: five tipping-bucket gauges (RN01–RN05) at the logging interval, hourly and daily, with lower and upper uncertainty bounds, July/August 2021 – January 2024.
- Soils: physical, hydraulic and chemical properties of 43 fields on 29 farms (smallholder and large farms; tilled, no-till and adjacent bush), with the management survey of each field, January–February 2022.
- Watershed characteristics: a 10 m land cover composite, a 10 m curve number layer, land cover shares and properties of 40 subwatersheds.
- Geospatial data: gauge locations, pour points, subwatersheds, streams and longest flow paths derived from the Copernicus GLO-30 DEM.
How the datasets are organized
The repository has four top-level folders, one per kind of data. Each dataset folder follows the same pattern:
- Data files. For streamflow and rainfall, the data are in a
*_Data/folder with one subfolder per processing level (*_raw,*_L0,*_L1,*_L2; see Processing levels below), and one file per station in each. For soils, the final tables (SoilsData.csv,FieldMgmtData.csv) are at the top of the folder, with the records they were built from inRawData/and intermediate tables inProcessedData/. For the watershed and geospatial data, each layer has its own folder. QAQC/holds the quality-control records: logs of every value that was removed, filled or flagged, and short reports of the rules and counts.Validation/holds comparisons with independent data (survey datums, the CETRAD stream gauges, CHIRPS and TAHMO rainfall, regional soil profiles) and the code that produces them. Where a folder has several figures, they are in one PDF with aFigures_PNG/folder of individual PNGs.Code/holds the scripts that rebuild the processed files from the raw files, with arequirements.txt(the Validation code folders point to the one in the dataset'sCode/), an MITLICENSEand a run order in the folder ReadMe.ReadMe.txtin every folder describes the files in that folder; the ReadMe at the top of each dataset folder gives every column, unit, flag and method.
Station files are named by station code and name, variable, processing level and time step, for example CA04_Likii_stage_L1_5min.csv, CA04_Likii_discharge_L2_daily.csv and RN03_Juakali_rainfall_L1_hourly.csv. Station locations are in Geospatial_Data/GaugeLocations.csv.
Hydrology_Field_Observations/Hydrology_DataTags.csv: QA/QC flag codes shared by streamflow and rainfallStreamflow/Streamflow_Data/:Streamflow_raw/,Streamflow_L0/,Streamflow_L1/,Streamflow_L2/(5min_L2/,Hourly_L2/,Daily_L2/),Barologger_raw/,Barologger_L0/,Barologger_L1/,BarologgerDataTags.csvRating_Curves/: BaRatinAGE rating curves, gaugings, cross-section and elevation surveysQAQC/: gap tables, imputation decisions, build reportsValidation/: sensor datum checks; discharge recomputed from the rating equations; comparison with the CETRAD stations (figure, statistics, code)Code/
Precipitation/Precipitation_Data/:Precipitation_raw/,Precipitation_L1/(Native_Resolution_L1/,Hourly_L1/,Daily_L1/)QAQC/: service and isolated tips removed, build summaryValidation/: comparison with CHIRPS, inter-gauge agreement, systematic lossesCode/
Soils_Field_Observations/SoilsData.csv: all soil measurements, long format, with QA/QC flagsFieldMgmtData.csv: management survey, one row per field*_metadata.csv,Soils_DataTags.csv: data dictionaries and flag codesRawData/,ProcessedData/,Code/,Validation/Watershed_Characteristics/SubwatershedProperties.csv: properties of the 40 subwatershedsLandCover/: 10 m land cover composite the curve numbers are built from, land cover per subwatershedCurveNumber/: curve number layer, class tables and rainfall zonesinputs_not_redistributed/: how to obtain the inputs that are not includedQAQC/,Code/Geospatial_Data/GaugeLocations.csv,PourPoints/,Streams/,WatershedDelineation/,QAQC/,Code/
FILE_MANIFEST.csv at the top of the repository lists every file with its path, size in bytes and SHA-256 checksum, so a download can be checked against it.
Processing levels
Files follow the CUAHSI ODM quality-control levels:
| Level | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Raw | records as downloaded or delivered, before quality control | Streamflow_Data/Streamflow_raw/, Precipitation_Data/Precipitation_raw/, Soils_Field_Observations/RawData/ |
| 0 | data as recorded, with QA/QC flags, nothing filled | Streamflow_L0/ stage, Barologger_L0/ pressure |
| 1 | quality-controlled data, the series to analyze | Streamflow_L1/ stage, Precipitation_L1/ rainfall |
| 2 | quantities derived from Level 1 | Streamflow_L2/ discharge |
For soils, the level of each measurement is given in SoilsData_metadata.csv.
Conventions
- Time: local time, East Africa Time (UTC+03:00), written
YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS. There is no daylight-saving time. - Missing values:
NAin every file. The one exception isCrossSection_build_table.csv, an input to the cross-section code, where an empty cell means "use the booked value". - Coordinates: WGS 84 (EPSG:4326) unless a file says otherwise; analysis layers in WGS 84 / UTM zone 37N (EPSG:32637).
- Files: CSV, UTF-8, comma-delimited, one header row.
- QA/QC flags: every value carries a flag. The codes are defined in
Hydrology_Field_Observations/Hydrology_DataTags.csv(stage, discharge and rainfall),Hydrology_Field_Observations/Streamflow/Streamflow_Data/BarologgerDataTags.csv(barometric pressure) andSoils_Field_Observations/Soils_DataTags.csv(soils).
Privacy
Coordinates of smallholder fields are published at two decimal places (about 1.1 km). Large farms, including the bush sites on them, carry no coordinates, only a location relative to the watershed. No file holds names, telephone numbers or finer positions.
Third-party data
Products that may not be redistributed are not included; the code downloads them, or the folder ReadMe says how to obtain them. The CETRAD Early Warning System and TAHMO station records are not included; only figures or statistics derived from them are. Derived products carry the attribution their sources require (Copernicus GLO-30, FABDEM (comparison only), ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, HYSOGs250m, KENSOTER (ISRIC; summary ranges only), Impact Observatory / Microsoft / Esri land cover, QED cropland included with the permission of The Nature Conservancy); see the folder ReadMe files.
Citation
Please cite the data descriptor that accompanies this repository: Willard, L. L. et al. A multi-domain field dataset to evaluate agricultural impacts at the edge of a Kenyan savanna. Scientific Data (in review).
License
The data are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), except two layers derived from the QED cropland layer (CC BY-SA 4.0, © The Nature Conservancy, 2019). These are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA 4.0):
- the land cover composite,
Watershed_Characteristics/LandCover/MountKenyaLULC_2022.tif - the curve number layer,
Watershed_Characteristics/CurveNumber/CurveNumber.tifandCN_class.tif
The code in each Code/ folder, and the scripts in Geospatial_Data/QAQC/ and Watershed_Characteristics/QAQC/, are licensed under the MIT license; see the LICENSE file in each of those folders.
Data Services
Related Resources
| This resource has a related resource in another format | HACHEME, G., & The Nature Conservancy. (2024). Dataset for the paper "EXPANDING SMALLHOLDER IRRIGATION IN CENTRAL KENYA DEMONSTRATES THE IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTING GRASSLAND LANDSCAPES" [Dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13860622 |
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
| Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
|---|---|---|
| The Nature Conservancy | Ecohydrological Model in Laikipia, Kenya to Evaluate Impacts of Land Use and Management | 002/2019 |
| National Institute of Food and Agriculture | Hatch Multistate Research Projects | S1089 |
Contributors
People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.
| Name | Organization | Address | Phone | Author Identifiers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre for Training and Integrated Research in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (CETRAD) | Nanyuki, Kenya | |||
| Ewaso Ng'iro North Basin Area - Kenya Water Resources Authority | Nanyuki, Kenya | |||
| Mpala Research Centre | Nanyuki, Kenya | |||
| Kevin Uno | Harvard University | Cambridge, Massachusetts |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment