Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Authors: |
|
|
---|---|---|
Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
Type: | Resource | |
Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.9 KB | |
Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 3:22 p.m. | |
Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 3:22 p.m. | |
Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
Sharing Status: | Public |
---|---|
Views: | 1439 |
Downloads: | 213 |
+1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
A fully integrated, physically-based MIKE SHE/MIKE11 model was developed for the Mokolo River basin flow system to simulate key hydraulic and hydrologic indicator inputs to the Downstream Response to Imposed Flow Transformation for Arid Rivers (DRIFT-ARID) decision support system (DSS). The DRIFT-ARID tool is used in this study to define environmental water requirements (EWR) for non-perennial river flow systems in South Africa to facilitate ecosystem-based management of water resources as required by the National Water Act (Act No. 36 of 1998). Fifty years of distributed daily climate data (1950 to 2000) were used to calibrate the model against decades of daily discharge data at various gauges, measurements of Mokolo Dam stage levels, and one-time groundwater level measurements at hundreds of wells throughout the basin. Though the calibrated model captures much of the seasonal and post-event stream discharge response characteristics, lack of sub-daily climate and stream discharge data limits the ability to calibrate the model to event-level system response (i.e. peak flows). In addition, lack of basic subsurface hydrogeologic characterisation and transient groundwater level data limits the ability to calibrate the groundwater flow model, and therefore baseflow response, to a high level. Despite these limitations, the calibrated model was used to simulate changes in hydrologic and hydraulic indicators at five study sites within the basin for five 50-year land-use change scenarios, including a present-day (with dam), natural conditions (no development/irrigation), and conversion of present-day irrigation to game farm, mine/city expansion, and a combination of the last two. Challenges and recommendations for simulating the range of non-perennial systems are presented.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
Name | Value |
---|---|
DOI | 10.4314/wsa.v42i3.03 |
Depth | |
Scale | 1 001 - 10 000 km² |
Layers | 3 |
Purpose | Decision support |
GroMoPo_ID | 307 |
IsVerified | True |
Model Code | MIKE-SHE |
Model Link | https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v42i3.03 |
Model Time | 1950-2000 |
Model Year | 2016 |
Model Authors | Prucha, B; Graham, D; Watson, M; Avenant, M; Esterhuyse, S; Joubert, A; Kemp, M; King, J; le Roux, P; Redelinghuys, N; Rossouw, L; Rowntree, K; Seaman, M; Sokolic, F; van Rensburg, L; van der Waal, B; van Tol, J; Vos, T |
Model Country | South Africa |
Data Available | Report/paper only |
Developer Email | prucha@integratedhydro.com |
Dominant Geology | Model focuses on multiple geologic materials |
Developer Country | USA; Denmark; South Africa |
Publication Title | MIKE-SHE integrated groundwater and surface water model used to simulate scenario hydrology for input to DRIFT-ARID: the Mokolo River case study |
Original Developer | No |
Additional Information | |
Integration or Coupling | Surface water |
Evaluation or Calibration | River discharge |
Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment