Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.7 KB | |
| Created: | Feb 07, 2023 at 7:18 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 07, 2023 at 7:18 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 772 |
| Downloads: | 213 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Rhythmic springs occur when a groundwater flowpath that supplies a spring's discharge form a hydraulic siphon. The hydraulic siphon brings the spring varying fluxes of water that cycle over time. If these flows are only one flowpath in the total spring system, the influx of water from the siphon may have strong effects on water quality, but be difficult to detect in hydrograph data during spring storm response. Oscillations in electrical conductivity data were observed at Byrds Mill Spring, Pontotoc County, Oklahoma (USA). Byrds Mill Spring is the largest spring in Oklahoma by volume, and oscillations in electrical conductivity were observed during a set of extreme precipitation events in May 2015. A data logger placed at the spring's outflow recorded the electrical conductivity of the spring's oscillating between 520 ?S/cm and 10 ?S/cm multiple times while discharge remained steady. A numerical tank model was developed to simulate the electrical conductivity chemograph of Byrds Mill Spring to test hypotheses about the geometry of the siphoning system. The model simplified the karst system as a tank connected to a siphoning drain and a tank connected to a non-siphoning drain joined together by mixing at a T-junction. Using this approach, the model was able to reproduce key features of the Byrds Mill Springs chemograph. The model results provide controls on where the siphon may be located and the dimensions of the siphon system.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | |
| Depth | |
| Scale | < 10 km² |
| Layers | 1 layer |
| Purpose | Groundwater resources;Groundwater contamination |
| GroMoPo_ID | 99 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | Custom made in excel |
| Model Link | https://www.proquest.com/openview/0c80a1cfb2133372c525a9d2c764188e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y |
| Model Time | 15-May |
| Model Year | 2020 |
| Model Authors | J. Richins |
| Model Country | United States |
| Data Available | Report/paper only |
| Developer Email | jgrichin@uark.edu |
| Dominant Geology | Carbonate (including karst) |
| Developer Country | United States |
| Publication Title | Analytical Modeling of Conductivity Chemographs of Byrds Mill Spring |
| Original Developer | Yes |
| Additional Information | Karst flow model of rhythmic spring |
| Integration or Coupling | Surface water;Geochemical |
| Evaluation or Calibration | Groundwater chemistry |
| Geologic Data Availability |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment