Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.3 MB | |
| Created: | Oct 08, 2019 at 5:41 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Oct 08, 2019 at 5:59 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 1528 |
| Downloads: | 43 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Lab material developed for GY320 at Colorado College. This exercise compares different formulations of bedrock erosion and the effects of each on landscape form, drainage network patterns, and long profiles. The comparison involves Fastscape, a simple stream power erosion model, and a stream power erosion model with sediment. The values of m and n can also be changes to switch from a shear stress to stream power model. A simulated landscape is run for 1 My with diffusion and the tested erosion model and the resulting topography, drainage pattern, and long profile is output. The model is run using the Landlab toolkit (https://landlab.github.io/#/) with the LinearDiffuser, FastScapeEroder, StreamPowerEroder, ErosionDeposition, FlowAccumulator, and DepressionFinderAndRouter components.
Subject Keywords
Content
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment