Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.7 KB | |
| Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 3:56 a.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 3:56 a.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 580 |
| Downloads: | 223 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
The unique characteristics of the hydrogeologic system of south Florida (flat topography, sandy soils, high water table, and highly developed canal system) cause significant interactions between ground water and surface water systems. Interaction processes involve infiltration, evapotranspiration (ET), runoff, and exchange of flow (seepage) between streams and aquifers. These interaction processes cannot be accurately simulated by either a surface water model or a ground water model alone because surface water models generally oversimplify ground water movement and ground water models generally oversimplify surface water movement. Estimates of the many components of flow between surface water and ground water (such as recharge and ET) made by the two types of models are often inconsistent. The inconsistencies are the result of differences in the calibration components and the model structures, and can affect the confidence level of the model application. In order to improve model results, a framework for developing a model which integrates a surface water model and a ground water model is presented. Dade County, Florida, is used as an example in developing the concepts of the integrated model. The conceptual model is based on the need to evaluate water supply management options involving the conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater, as well as the evaluation of the impacts of proposed wellfields. The mathematical structure of the integrated model is based on the South Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM) (MacVicar et al., 1984) and A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW) (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988).
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03336.x |
| Depth | 16 |
| Scale | 1 001 - 10 000 km² |
| Layers | 3 |
| Purpose | Groundwater resources;Scientific investigation (not related to applied problem);Decision support |
| GroMoPo_ID | 186 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | MODFLOW;SFWMM |
| Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03336.x |
| Model Time | SS |
| Model Year | 1994 |
| Model Authors | YAN, JS; SMITH, KR |
| Model Country | United States |
| Data Available | Report/paper only |
| Developer Email | NA |
| Dominant Geology | Carbonate (including karst) |
| Developer Country | United States |
| Publication Title | SIMULATION OF INTEGRATED SURFACE-WATER AND GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS - MODEL FORMULATION |
| Original Developer | No |
| Additional Information | A model coupling the South Florida Water Management Model and MODFLOW to better model the water resources of Miami-Dade County in Florida, USA. Surface water canals are coupled with the Biscayne Aquifer |
| Integration or Coupling | Surface water |
| Evaluation or Calibration | Unsure |
| Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment