Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 122.6 KB | |
| Created: | Apr 22, 2024 at 9:09 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Apr 22, 2024 at 9:23 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 324 |
| Downloads: | 5 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the GEOGLOWS in comparison to the National Water Model (NWM) by extracting and analyzing historical simulation data. Utilizing the VPU unit 702 as a focal point, we will extract historical simulations from both GEOGLOWS and NWM and apply a suite of performance metrics, including Mean Error (ME), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Pearson's r, and R-squared.
The objective is to assess the goodness of fit for both the global and local models to determine whether the global model (GEOGLOWS) performs comparably to the local model (NWM) in terms of accuracy and reliability in hydrological predictions.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
| Start Date: | |
|---|---|
| End Date: |
Content
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment