Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Shane Creek (Konza Prairie) Experiment Stream Temperature, Intermittency, and Conductivity Data (AIMS_GP_SHN_approach4_STIC)
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 35.5 MB | |
| Created: | Mar 10, 2026 at 5:40 p.m. (UTC) | |
| Last updated: | Mar 16, 2026 at 1:06 p.m. (UTC) (Metadata update) | |
| Published date: | Mar 16, 2026 at 1:06 p.m. (UTC) | |
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.c10e6eb12d6042709daa3fb93838ec00 | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource | |
| Content types: | CSV Content |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 91 |
| Downloads: | 6 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
This resource includes Stream Temperature, Intermittency, and Conductivity (STIC) data collected from the Shane Creek Experimental Reach within the Konza Prairie Biological Station. These data were collected in support of the sampling goals of the Aquatic Intermittency effects on Microbiomes in Streams (AIMS) Project. This study took place in Shane’s Creek (434 ha) at the Konza Prairie Biological Station, a long term ecological research station that has been in operation since 1980. Shane’s Creek is annually cattle-grazed and burned every three years. Konza is located in the Flint Hills of northern Kansas. In 2023, the outlet of the stream wet up in March and dried down in July; in 2024, the outlet of the stream wet up in March and dried down in September. Average annual precipitation for this site is 35.62 inches.
We constructed a wooden stream diversion structure halfway down a 380m reach containing four pools and three riffles above and below the structure. The structure had 4 1-foot diameter holes installed with PVC couplers. Four 130m corrugated flexible tubes were laid out from the diversion structure to the bottom of the impact reach. We deployed 20 STICs throughout the control and impact reach to quantify the extent of drying using rebar. Two additional STICs were deployed in the riparian zone as control STICs. Construction and preparation occurred in February and March, when the stream was dry, to minimize construction-related disturbances to the experimental sampling. Prior to experimental dry down, water was able to flow from upstream (control reach) to downstream (impact reach) through the holes. We obtained pre-dry down sampling to collect a reference point for both the control and impact reaches. These “pre-dry week X” samples were collected from April to mid-July due to multiple flooding events (April 25th, June 26th, and July 3rd) that disrupted the experimental setup and required redeployment of experimental structures and equipment. During the experimental dry down (“dry week X” samples), we attached the tubes to the couplers in the diversion structure. Flow was diverted around the impact reach into the downstream watershed for five weeks, during which we collected weekly samples. Following the final forced drying sampling, tubes were cut from their couplers to allow flow to resume in the impact reach (“re-wet week X” samples). After 6 hours, we performed day 0 re-wet sampling. Twenty four hours later, we performed day 1 re-wet sampling. One week later, the stream began to naturally dry down in both the control and impact reaches, and collected weekly natural dry down samples for two weeks (“natural dry down week X” samples). Each .csv file is associated with a single sampling site and sublocation.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
| Start Date: | |
|---|---|
| End Date: |
Content
Related Resources
| This resource conforms to established standard described by | Godsey, S., C. Wheeler, S. Zipper (2024). AIMS SOP STIC Deployment and Maintenance, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/c82a87a6c63445029d35131260241386 |
| This resource conforms to established standard described by | Burke, E., J. Wilhelm, S. Zipper, C. Brown (2024). AIMS SOP STIC Calibration, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/9f2027c779d64149be32bdb9eede54f2 |
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
| Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. National Science Foundation | Aquatic Intermittency Effects of Microbiomes on Streams | 2019603 |
Contributors
People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.
| Name | Organization | Address | Phone | Author Identifiers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexi Sommerville | University of Kansas | KS, US | ||
| claudia dorantes | University of Kansas | KS, US | ||
| Taylor Layman | University of Kansas | KS, US | ||
| Sam Zipper | University of Kansas | KS, US | ORCID , GoogleScholarID | |
| Amy Burgin | Iowa State University | IA, US | ||
| Lydia Zeglin | Kansas State University | KS, US |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment