Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.6 KB | |
| Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 2:17 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 2:18 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 627 |
| Downloads: | 213 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Groundwater flow modelling is an important technique which is used to study the dynamics of groundwater systems. Although, complex groundwater system with large set of parameters and associated uncertainty with those parameters makes modelling exercise difficult. In this study, development of groundwater model for Varanasi city and near around area was prompted to understand the groundwater dynamics and future groundwater resource scenarios in the region. The model was developed for the area of 2785 km(2), where aquifer thickness varied up-to 150 m. The model grid consisted of 210 rows and 210 columns with each cell size of 250 m x 250 m. To realize the different type of underground formations, model was built for five layers with recharge entering the aquifer from surface infiltration through the overlying confining unit and from seepage through riverbeds. The maximum part of the model domain is surrounded by the Ganga River, which was taken as a hydrologic boundary for the model. Model simulations were made to quantify groundwater flow within the alluvial aquifer as well as flow into and out of the system. The groundwater model was developed for the transient state condition for the year of 2006 to 2017. Several criteria were used during model development and calibration to determine how fine the model simulated conditions in the aquifer. Model calibration was done on the values of hydraulic conductivity and recharge rates. A root-mean-square error analysis was performed during calibration to serve as a criterion to minimize differences between observed and model computed water levels. Further, calibrated model was used to analyze different scenarios to understand the future scenario of water resources.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11269-020-02538-z |
| Depth | |
| Scale | 1 001 - 10 000 km² |
| Layers | 5 |
| Purpose | Groundwater resources;Streamlfow depletion |
| GroMoPo_ID | 262 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | MODFLOW |
| Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02538-z |
| Model Time | 2006-2017 |
| Model Year | 2020 |
| Model Authors | Omar, PJ; Gaur, S; Dwivedi, SB; Dikshit, PKS |
| Model Country | India |
| Data Available | Report/paper only |
| Developer Email | sss.padam.omar@gnail.com |
| Dominant Geology | Siliciclastic sedimentary (sandstones, shales) |
| Developer Country | India |
| Publication Title | A Modular Three-Dimensional Scenario-Based Numerical Modelling of Groundwater Flow |
| Original Developer | No |
| Additional Information | |
| Integration or Coupling | None of the above |
| Evaluation or Calibration | Static water levels;Dynamic water levels;Baseflow |
| Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment