Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.5 KB | |
| Created: | Feb 06, 2023 at 8:28 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 06, 2023 at 8:28 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 635 |
| Downloads: | 218 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
In general, groundwater flow and transport models are being applied to investigate a wide variety of hydrogeological conditions besides to calculate the rate and direction of movement of groundwater through aquifers and confining units in the subsurface. Transport models estimate the concentration of a chemical in groundwater which requires the development of a calibrated groundwater flow model or, at a minimum, an accurate determination of the velocity and direction of groundwater flow that is based on field data. All the available hydrogeological, geophysical and water quality data in Musi basin, Hyderabad, India, were fed as input to the model to obtain the groundwater flow velocities and the interaction of surface water and groundwater and thereby seepage loss was estimated. This in turn paved the way to calculate the capacity of the storage treatment plants (STP) to be established at the inlets of six major lakes of the basin. The total dissolved solid was given as the pollutant load in the mass transport model, and through model simulation, its migration at present and futuristic scenarios was brought out by groundwater flow and mass transport modeling. The average groundwater velocity estimated through the flow model was 0.26 m/day. The capacities of STP of various lakes in the study area were estimated based on the lake seepage and evaporation loss. Based on the groundwater velocity and TDS as pollutant load in the lakes, the likely contamination from lakes at present and for the next 20 years was predicted.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13201-019-1048-z |
| Depth | 50 |
| Scale | < 100 km² |
| Layers | 2-5 layers |
| Purpose | groundwater contamination;groundwater flow velocity |
| GroMoPo_ID | 13 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | MODFLOW |
| Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1048-z |
| Model Time | SS |
| Model Year | 2020 |
| Model Authors | N. Sundararajan, S. Sankaran |
| Model Country | India |
| Data Available | report/paper only |
| Developer Email | raajanns@hotmail.com |
| Dominant Geology | Unsure |
| Developer Country | developer: India, institution: Sultanate of Oman |
| Publication Title | Groundwater modeling of Musi basin Hyderabad, India: a case study |
| Original Developer | No |
| Additional Information | |
| Integration or Coupling | Surface water |
| Evaluation or Calibration | static water levels;contaminant concentrations |
| Geologic Data Availability |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment