Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
Field Observation of Seasonal Wave and Current Dynamics around a Hybrid Marsh-Rock Sill Living Shoreline
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 9.9 GB | |
| Created: | Jan 24, 2026 at 2:09 p.m. (UTC) | |
| Last updated: | Jan 26, 2026 at 2:40 p.m. (UTC) (Metadata update) | |
| Published date: | Jan 26, 2026 at 2:40 p.m. (UTC) | |
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.e9ce9cd322944c5fa22f0bf9e0ceae75 | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 34 |
| Downloads: | 1 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
The combination of low-crested breakwaters, or sills, and marshes forms a common and effective coastal nature-based solution. However, uncertainty about their performance has limited their widespread adoption when compared to conventional structure-based coastal protection. In this study, we conducted nearly one year of field measurements to evaluate the functionality of a hybrid structure and vegetation feature, commonly referred to as a marsh-sill, in a relatively sheltered bay in rural Virginia. The rock sill’s crest was ~1 m high, ~1 m wide at the crest, with a 1:1.5 offshore slope, and the marsh was ~6 m wide in the direction normal to the shoreline. Wave and current sensors were deployed at multiple locations to measure hydrodynamic variables, particularly wave height and currents. Observations indicated that on average, the rock sill and marsh vegetation attenuate waves by 54% and 7%, respectively. Wave transmission through the rock sill was compared to existing empirical formulas that relate wave transmission to relative freeboard, relative structure crest width, and surf similarity, and new equations are proposed to describe the year-long field observations. Currents in the marsh behind the sill are 55% weaker than currents offshore of the rock sill. The marsh-sill was found to be effective in reducing waves and currents consistently throughout the deployment.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
| Start Date: | |
|---|---|
| End Date: |
Content
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
| Agency Name | Award Title | Award Number |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia Sea Grant |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment