Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Sauk Watershed DHSVM-RBM 2018 model results: historic and future streamflows for network forcing of sediment models


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 451.2 MB
Created: Aug 16, 2018 at 3:23 p.m.
Last updated: Aug 16, 2018 at 9:34 p.m.
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Public
Views: 1571
Downloads: 62
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

In the DHSVM-glacier model update, we incorporated RBM, a spatially distributed semi-Lagrangian stream temperature model (Yearsley 2009, 2012). At each time step and each stream segment, DHSVM now provides to RBM the hydrologic and meteorological inputs including air temperature, downward short wave and long wave radiation, vapor pressure, wind speed, and reach inflows and outflows. A proof of concept Source-to-Sink Network Routing Model was developed to capture the sediment transport given capacity generated from the largest annual storms, mass wasting events, and networked for 439 stream links in the Sauk watershed. The simulation results are for streamflow in each stream link from running the DHSVM-Glacier-RBM model for sediment network modeling. For developing scenarios and testing the proof-of-concept sediment network modeling, this includes 40 year time intervals from one historic (1960-2010) and three future climate scenarios (2060-2099).

Subject Keywords

Content

How to Cite

Bandaragoda, C., S. LEE (2018). Sauk Watershed DHSVM-RBM 2018 model results: historic and future streamflows for network forcing of sediment models, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/f16bdb504c6a4fb39e80ff1070a86704

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required